September 20, 2012
Comments Off on The Three Most Important Things CSS Can Do to Reduce Faculty Concerns about Campus Shared Services
As we make clear in the accompanying letter, the Berkeley Faculty Association Board has many concerns about the planning of Campus Shared Service. Though all of our requests for additional information are extremely important to us, we recognize that you … Continue reading
September 17, 2012
Comments Off on BFA Response to Szeri CSS Memo of 8/10/12
Dear Andrew: Thank you for responding to our July 2, 2012, memo regarding the planning of the Campus Shared Services and the planned transfer of staff to 4th Street. As we said in our memo, we have many questions and concerns about the design of the CSS plan, key features of which have still not been made public. We would like to help the campus design a CSS program that will not only save the campus money, but also minimize the disruption to faculty and ensure that we continue to obtain the staff support we need to deal with research grants, manage events, appoint GSIs and GSRs, manage faculty recruitment and retention, obtain computer support, and the like […] Continue reading
August 15, 2012
Comments Off on Andrew Szeri’s Response to the BFA Memo of 7/2/12 on Campus Shared Services
Thank you for your constructive memo regarding shared services dated July 2. It is my pleasure to respond on behalf of the OE Executive Committee and the Campus Shared Services (CSS) Implementation Team. I will address as many of the specific points as I can […] Continue reading
July 2, 2012
Comments Off on BFA Statement on Campus Shared Services 7/2/2012
As you may have heard, the Operational Excellence leadership is instituting a Campus Shared Services (CSS) initiative that includes the removal of hundreds of departmental/program/center staff to an off-campus center on 4th Street. This move was slated to begin in September, but has been postponed to January 2013 because there wasn’t enough time to prepare the new site (a troubling indication of poor planning). We welcome this delay, however, as it gives faculty and staff needed time to troubleshoot the plan and urge solutions before the move begins.
We are gravely concerned about the design of the CSS plan, key features of which have still not been made public. We are worried about the lack of a clear financing scheme and recharge costs to departments. We are concerned about OE’s failure to study the impact of this restructuring on the staff support we faculty need to deal with research grants, manage events, appoint GSIs and GSRs, manage faculty recruitment and retention, obtain computer support, and the like.